[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17941

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-23 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 22:38 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 22:29 --- Subject: Bug 17941 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-23 22:29:41 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog arith.c primary.c

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-01-22 01:32 --- A new path is available. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-01/msg00243.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17941

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-01-15 22:27 --- I started a thread on c.l.f. The title is "whitespace in signed real literal constants. So far, it appears that the code is indeed standard conforming. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-01-15 20:34 --- Paul, the code is legal! Both NAG and Lahey compile the code without warning or error. Apparently, IFC also compiles the code. I just sent you a new patch to fix the bug. -- http://gc

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-15 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15 11:09 --- Technically illagal, so removing rejects-valid keyword. IFC is not a particularly good judge of whether code is legal ;-) -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2005-01-06 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||19292 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17941

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2004-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-31 06:08 --- (In reply to comment #4) > fiexes the problem. s/fiexes/fixes/ -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2004-12-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-12-31 06:06 --- The patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-12/msg00265.html fiexes the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17941

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2004-10-12 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-12 21:37 --- No, that's not sufficient. mpfr_set_str apparently doesn't like spaces in constants. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17941

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2004-10-11 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 22:48 --- I'm not sure if this suffices, will try tomorrow: Index: primary.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/primary.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 dif

[Bug fortran/17941] gfortran: parser chokes on complex literal constant

2004-10-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:51 --- Confirmed, IFC accepts the code. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED