[Bug fortran/17123] Assertion fail in trans-const.c

2005-09-13 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 20:11 --- This has been fixed on mainline by the patch for PR 19928. As noted there PR 17123 really seems to be a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19928 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/17123] Assertion fail in trans-const.c

2005-07-24 Thread refson dot temp at ntlworld dot com
--- Additional Comments From refson dot temp at ntlworld dot com 2005-07-24 10:36 --- Please accept my apologies. I had not realised that this was a gcc-developers-only site and that bug reports from users are not welcome. I have no expertise in compiler development so the likelyhood o

[Bug fortran/17123] Assertion fail in trans-const.c

2005-07-14 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 22:19 --- There are many wrong-code and rejects-valid bugs effecting gfortran. This one is no worse than the others. The only way to make sure a bug is fixed is to fix it yourself or pay someone else to fix it for you

[Bug fortran/17123] Assertion fail in trans-const.c

2005-03-23 Thread refson dot temp at ntlworld dot com
--- Additional Comments From refson dot temp at ntlworld dot com 2005-03-23 11:16 --- This bug is a complete showstopper, but has been sitting unresolved for 6 months. Is there any way to increase the priority and actually have it assigned to anyone? There is no way to even test that t