--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13
20:11 ---
This has been fixed on mainline by the patch for PR 19928.
As noted there PR 17123 really seems to be a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19928 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From refson dot temp at ntlworld dot com
2005-07-24 10:36 ---
Please accept my apologies. I had not realised that this was a
gcc-developers-only site and that bug reports from users are not
welcome. I have no expertise in compiler development so the
likelyhood o
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14
22:19 ---
There are many wrong-code and rejects-valid bugs effecting gfortran. This one is
no worse than the others. The only way to make sure a bug is fixed is to fix it
yourself or pay someone else to fix it for you
--- Additional Comments From refson dot temp at ntlworld dot com
2005-03-23 11:16 ---
This bug is a complete showstopper, but has been sitting unresolved
for 6 months. Is there any way to increase the priority and actually
have it assigned to anyone? There is no way to even test that t