--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 21:01
---
The patch has been on mainline since May 18th.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16898
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 21:00
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobi at gcc dot g
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04
21:00 ---
Subject: Bug 16898
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-04 20:59:51
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 21:24
---
Fixed by Zdenek's recent patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00178.html, keeping this bug open until
the patch is also committed to the 4.0 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 17:50
---
I have on Linux/x86-64 these passes - which means all of them pass:
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90 -O0 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90 -O1 execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_point
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10
13:21 ---
This is not fixed.
It still fails for me at -O2 in i686-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16898
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-12-10
13:02 ---
Andrew,
This one is fixed now, isn't it? It runs fine with the CVS of 20041205
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16898
