--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-18
05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 16861
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-18 05:18:55
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: module.c ChangeLog
gcc/tests
--- Additional Comments From paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2005-09-15 14:25 ---
I did not want to mess around by submitting from a Windows machine again, so
here is a preview of a proposed patch:
==
--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-11 16:28
---
(In reply to comment #22)
A thoroughly reduced testcase is:
module foo
INTEGER :: i
end module foo
module bar
contains
subroutine sub(j)
use foo
integer, dimension(i) :: j !change dimension to expl
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 17:12
---
For the example in comment #14, the USE of MOD2 in MOD3 is not parsing the
saved MOD2 module correctly causing J1 to be restored with a NULL symtree.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16861
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-29
10:56 ---
Subject: Bug 16861
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-29 10:56:18
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19
07:24 ---
Like comment #5 says, this one is not fixed. The patch I committed only adress
part of the issue. Removed patch keyword accordingly.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19
07:10 ---
Subject: Bug 16861
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-19 07:10:06
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog resolve.c
gcc/test
--- Additional Comments From yosef at phys dot utb dot edu 2005-04-19
01:09 ---
Hi,
The patch seems to fix part of the problem (the simplified test
code from comment 4 now compiles), but the original code that
I submitted still causes gfortran to segfault. I simplified my original
cod
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18
13:12 ---
I think I found a patch for this one. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00507.html
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-18
13:10 ---
I confirm this issue is still present as of 2005-01-18. As a important number of
people here, this is blocking my code from compiling smoothly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16861
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
17:13 ---
*** Bug 19460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2004-12-02 10:38 ---
The 11th November still gives this behaviour. However, if the USE FOO is
raised to the module level, all is well. For example, this slightly expanded
version compiles and runs fine.
module FO
--- Additional Comments From dmitrym at acres dot com dot au 2004-11-09
05:35 ---
The bug 17764 was incorrectly linked to this (see comments in that entry).
I simplified the 20k source file above to ~600 bytes. Compilation attempt (using
gfortran as of Nov 09, 2004) still gives "Interna
13 matches
Mail list logo
