[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-06-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-06-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #24 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8422524f6f43263caca2c2ab8a0e890e92f5f114 commit r15-9861-g8422524f6f43263caca2c2ab8a0e890e92f5f114 Author: Paul Thomas D

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-06-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle --- Paul is out for about two weeks. I have appled the two patches involved to 15 and if testing is clean, I will commit.

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-06-25 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Andre Vehreschild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #20) > Should this issue be marked as resolved? If so, can the fix be back ported > to the 15 branch? I think it is resolved. It could be backported. Paul if you ar

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-31 Thread damian at archaeologic dot codes via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #20 from Damian Rouson --- Should this issue be marked as resolved? If so, can the fix be back ported to the 15 branch?

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #19 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:625b805544101ae90fbe789a5eeba44cd14e89fb commit r16-434-g625b805544101ae90fbe789a5eeba44cd14e89fb Author: Paul Thomas Date: Wed M

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-02 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #18 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/2/25 01:06, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I got to thinking for once. I think that your change to primary.cc has cast > the > net a bit too wide and risks turning other kinds of interf

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Comment on attachment 61202 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61202 fix the issues Hi Steve, I got to thinking for once. I think that your change to primary.cc has cast the net a bit too

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #16 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/1/25 11:55, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to kargls from comment #14) >> HI Pau

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to kargls from comment #14) > HI Paul, > > The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is > that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name > while latter does not use result-nam

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #14 from kargls at comcast dot net --- HI Paul, The difference in my pr119948_1.f90 and pr119948_2.f90 is that the former is Damian's testcase with a result-name while latter does not use result-name so the function-name is the resul

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Oh s***t! Don't do that - post in the existing PR. I must confess that I looked at the second testcase and couldn't see the difference. I'll put stronger glasses on. Thanks Paul

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #12 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/1/25 07:45, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) >> T

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #10) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : I will close as fixed if no appetite for backporting is expressed in the next week. Paul

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a commit r16-329-g0abc77da9d704bba55a376bb5c162a54826ab94a Author: Paul Thomas Date: Thu M

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8) > Occam's razor suggests we go with Paul's patch. Paul, do you want to handle > the commit-ish work or I can do it for you. Just let me know. I'll do the commit lat

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Occam's razor suggests we go with Paul's patch. Paul, do you want to handle the commit-ish work or I can do it for you. Just let me know.

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-28 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 4/28/25 07:30, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 > > --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) >> Cre

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > Created attachment 61214 [details] > Yet another fix for this PR > > I don't quite know whose patch is purer. This one also regtests OK. > > I will think about it

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-27 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-04-27 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-26 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net --- Created attachment 61202 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61202&action=edit fix the issues The attached patch has passed regression testing on x86_64-*-freebsd. * pri

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-25 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #2 from kargls at comcast dot net --- (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #0) > > % gfortran -c source-allocate-pure-function-result-component.f90 > source-allocate-pure-function-result.f90:17:20: > >17 | allocate(test%i

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

2025-04-25 Thread kargls at comcast dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 kargls at comcast dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargls at comcast dot net --