https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
--- Comment #5 from Visagan Ravindran ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Visagan Ravindran from comment #2)
> > > Thank you for your reply. A colleague informed me that the NAG compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
--- Comment #3 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Visagan Ravindran from comment #2)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> > Perhaps, a review of the Fortran standard is in order.
> >
> >F2023, 9.4.1
> >
> >R910 substrin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
--- Comment #2 from Visagan Ravindran ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #1)
> Perhaps, a review of the Fortran standard is in order.
>
>F2023, 9.4.1
>
>R910 substring-range is [ scalar-int-expr ] : [ scalar-int-expr ]
>
>The v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119827
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
