https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9988d7e004796ab531df7bcda45788a7aa9276d7
commit r15-2902-g9988d7e004796ab531df7bcda45788a7aa9276d7
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #15 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #14)
>
> Can you construct a testcase which is missed?
>
Apparently, no! :)
Of course, I'm trying to multitask between work and non-work.
Patch looks good to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #13)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #11)
> > Created attachment 58926 [details]
> > Patch
> >
> > This patch applies the check of the declared type in resolv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #13 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #11)
> Created attachment 58926 [details]
> Patch
>
> This patch applies the check of the declared type in resolve_array_list,
> where there is already a check f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 58926
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58926&action=edit
Patch
This patch applies the check of the declared type in resolve_array_list,
where there is alre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #9 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #7)
> > I can no longer edit meta data for a PR. The keyword: field is wrong. This
> > is an ice-on-invalid-code. Please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
I can no longer edit meta data for a PR. The keyword: field is wrong. This is
an ice-on-invalid-code. Please change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #6 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
Created attachment 58911
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58911&action=edit
Fix the ICE by detecting invalid code
The attached patch catches F2023:C7125. It does not address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #5 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #4)
> F2023:C7124 (R781) An ac-value shall not be unlimited polymorphic.
>
> 3.149
> unlimited polymorphic
> able to have any dynamic type (3.144.4) during progra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There may be some doubt on the validity of the testcase.
Intel ifx:
pr114308.f90(20): warning #9108: Polymorphic values in array constructors will
be converted to their declared type. [A_ARRAY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114308
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC before 7 didn't support this feature:
Error: Assignment to an allocatable polymorphic variable at (1) is not yet
supported
17 matches
Mail list logo
