[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd2cd1e70509aaeb3db3e7b322d8357bac817632 commit r10-11289-gdd2cd1e70509aaeb3db3e7b322d8357bac817632 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfcdb457c462b9e35eb54d3b758221a119067e24 commit r11-10625-gdfcdb457c462b9e35eb54d3b758221a119067e24 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64efeac03cb9fa2603bb6628712f3a2541aef1cb commit r12-9402-g64efeac03cb9fa2603bb6628712f3a2541aef1cb Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa4cb42870df60debdbd51e2ddc6d6ab9e6a commit r13-7188-gfa4cb42870df60debdbd51e2ddc6d6ab9e6a Author: Harald Anlauf Date: F

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread sebastien at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #5 from Sébastien Villemot --- Thanks for your work on this issue!

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 54860 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54860&action=edit Patch Patch I am testing.

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's even worse, as simplification for arguments X below one gives wrong results: set_exponent(0.75, 3) gives 3., while the runtime version correctly prints 6.00 All gfortran versio

[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|