[Bug fortran/104651] [OOP] CLASS with assumed-size/assumed-rank array

2025-02-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104651 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Cf. also commit r15-7661-g8293b9e40f12e9 – especially the FIXME in in trans-types.cc's gfc_get_derived_type.

[Bug fortran/104651] [OOP] CLASS with assumed-size/assumed-rank array

2022-02-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104651 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0) > > Error: Rank mismatch in argument ‘x’ at (1) (rank-1 and rank-2) > > Error: Rank mismatch in argument ‘y’ at (1) (rank-2 a

[Bug fortran/104651] [OOP] CLASS with assumed-size/assumed-rank array

2022-02-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104651 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Additionally, for the following (from gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/finalize_15.f90), class(t1), allocatable :: x(:,:) call fin_test_1(x(::2,::3)) with subroutine fin_test_1(x) class(t1), intent(out

[Bug fortran/104651] [OOP] CLASS with assumed-size/assumed-rank array

2022-02-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104651 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---