https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84807af0ca6dfdb81abb8e925ce32acbcab29868
commit r13-3342-g84807af0ca6dfdb81abb8e925ce32acbcab29868
Author: Steve Kargl
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 08:24:36PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> I think it is obvious that we cannot simplify IMAGE_INDEX here.
> If you don't object, I will commit your fix for you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Better test cases (valid) instead of accidentally invalid z2.f90 :
$ cat zz4.f90
program p
class(*), allocatable :: x[:]
allocate (real :: x[*])
print *, image_index(x, [1])
end
$ cat zz5.f90
pr
