https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 58296
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58296&action=edit
Fix for this PR
This does fix it :-)
It's a partial implementation that will require class components and array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
The "fix" in comment 5 no longer does the job. It's on my TODO list.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Arjen Markus from comment #2)
> That reduced example is wonderfully compact! (I checked for similar reports
> but probably missed bug report 79440, because it was not associated with
> "recursiv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
--- Comment #2 from Arjen Markus ---
That reduced example is wonderfully compact! (I checked for similar reports but
probably missed bug report 79440, because it was not associated with
"recursive" data types)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104048
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.1.0
Keywords|
