[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-12-14 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9) --- snip --- > > The mention of binutils jogged my memory. I had a test failure that showed > up randomly one time. It was related to class_transformational_2.f9

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-12-13 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-12-13 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon --- Sorry for the delay: it took me a while to reproduce the problem manually, while it does show up in CI. The problem does not happen when I rebuild a full toolchain (trunk binutils + trunk glibc + trunk gc

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-12-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 59839 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59839&action=edit Instrumtented class_transformational_2.f90 Hi Christophe, Would you be so kind as to try compiling and running

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-12-11 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-12-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31250baf81446aa4fc1b729e2fc5165a36005ebc commit r15-5897-g31250baf81446aa4fc1b729e2fc5165a36005ebc Author: Paul Thomas Date: Tue D

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-08-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cb07a38233aadb4b389a6e5236c95f52241b6e0 commit r15-2739-g4cb07a38233aadb4b389a6e5236c95f52241b6e0 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Tue A

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2024-06-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2023-11-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 56730 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56730&action=edit Another failing testcase With the attached, we should get: [pault@pc30 pr87477]$ rm ./a.out;ifort ~/prs/pr102689

[Bug fortran/102689] Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument

2023-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|