--- Comment #7 from martinrb at google dot com 2008-10-09 23:16 ---
> The flag `-Bsymbolic' works (or at least is accepted)
> despite the fact that it is not documented that such a
> flag is passed to the linker.
Ops.
Please ignore my previous msg.
I have misunderstood for y
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 23:15 ---
-B is documented on
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/Directory-Options.html:
-Bprefix
This option specifies where to find the executables, libraries, include files,
and data files of the compiler itself.
--- Comment #5 from martinrb at google dot com 2008-10-09 23:10 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If you want to use a specific linker option, use -Wl,XYZ or -Xlinker XYZ .
> Since those are the documented way to pass a linker option via gcc.
I know about -Wl, and -Xlinker.
I am trying t
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 20:34 ---
If you want to use a specific linker option, use -Wl,XYZ or -Xlinker XYZ .
Since those are the documented way to pass a linker option via gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37786
--- Comment #3 from martinrb at google dot com 2008-10-09 19:26 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> "Only a few systems support this option."
>
> x86-linux-gnu is one of those targets that don't support this option :).
>
> There is no changes needed here for the documentation as far as
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 19:00 ---
"Only a few systems support this option."
x86-linux-gnu is one of those targets that don't support this option :).
There is no changes needed here for the documentation as far as I can tell so
closing as inval
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 18:57 ---
The -Bsymbolic* options are linker options so they don't get documented in
GCC's documentation at all.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37786
