[Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec

--- Additional Comments From ryan dot oliver at pha dot com dot au 2005-02-08 07:22 --- (In reply to comment #5) > The patch was approved by the RM here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00850.html > > but it is still not applied. It would be great if you could pls co

[Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec

--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-27 21:39 --- The patch was approved by the RM here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00850.html but it is still not applied. It would be great if you could pls commit this patch then close the BZ. Many t

[Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 05:49 --- (In reply to comment #3) > BTW, at first glance, the patch you posted cannot possibly be correct. An "if" > statement was removed but the following "else if" statement was left in place. > Then again, I coul

[Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec

--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-12 05:46 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hmm, this SPEC should be removed from the mainline, it is unused in GCC at > all. Ok, good. I suppose removing faulty code is better then leaving it there for folks to (ab)use.

[Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-10 02:52 --- Patch to remove STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC support: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353

[Bug driver/19353] Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-10 02:36 --- Hmm, this SPEC should be removed from the mainline, it is unused in GCC at all. Most of the use of this was removed when this patch was applied: . In