https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c45da4414884a5424484f5db1ab951d9de6
commit r10-9070-g3c45da4414884a5424484f5db1ab951d9de6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
FWIW, I cherry-picked the fix onto vendors/redhat/gcc-10-branch branch.
I can build 5.10 kernel with the fixed GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87b7d45e358e4df93b6a93b2e7a55b123ea76f5d
commit r11-4933-g87b7d45e358e4df93b6a93b2e7a55b123ea76f5d
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #13 from Jiri Olsa ---
hi,
any update on the fix? I'm seeing the bug now in fedora 32 with:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20201005 (Red Hat 10.2.1-5)
thanks,
jirka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #11 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> RHEL8 uses gcc 8 which is not affected (unless one uses DTS/GTS).
> Also, it is unclear for what in particular pahole or what wants to use
> DW_AT_declaration.
pah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
RHEL8 uses gcc 8 which is not affected (unless one uses DTS/GTS).
Also, it is unclear for what in particular pahole or what wants to use
DW_AT_declaration.
DW_TAG_subprogram of a real definition (that hasn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #9 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Also, to avoid confusion, upstream 10 branch is not affected, but in 10-RH
> we've backported the PR96383 changes from the trunk.
Is this gcc going to RHEL8? that co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfortunately the patch doesn't really bootstrap.
Small testcase that ICEs:
struct S { virtual ~S (); } s;
This is on the external S::~S() declaration, which has non-NULL
decl_ultimate_origin (the abstract de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.2.1 |11.0
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So perhaps completely untested:
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj 2020-09-07 13:17:58.383594248 +0200
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2020-09-16 10:53:44.353632197 +0200
@@ -26547,7 +26547,8 @@ dwarf2out_early_global_decl (tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #4 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So this is really just something like: -O2 -g -dA:
> extern int foo (unsigned int, unsigned int);
>
> int
> bar (void)
> {
> foo (1, 2);
> return 0;
> }
>
> whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Olsa ---
Created attachment 49223
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49223&action=edit
fs/init.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-16
Ever confirmed|0
18 matches
Mail list logo
