[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

2024-04-15 Thread dblaikie at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 --- Comment #5 from David Blaikie --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to David Blaikie from comment #2) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > > We produce an abstract copy for use by repeated inline copies.

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

2024-04-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

2024-04-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

2017-01-26 Thread dblaikie at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 --- Comment #3 from David Blaikie --- ping

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

2016-11-14 Thread dblaikie at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 --- Comment #2 from David Blaikie --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > We produce an abstract copy for use by repeated inline copies. Yep! Is it still reasonable to consider it a bug (or at least a feature request) that this is sti

[Bug debug/78322] Debug info still present for fully optimized away functions

2016-11-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- We produce an abstract copy for use by repeated inline copies.