https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Arnez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Sep 25 07:37:36 2014
New Revision: 215582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-25 Andreas Arnez
PR 63300/debug
* tree.c (check_ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Sorry about that. I added an explicit testcases
(gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/const-volatile.c and
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/restrict.c) explicitly to catch such issue. But
apparently they didn't trigger t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
