http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-05-04
03:37:44 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed May 4 03:37:40 2011
New Revision: 173351
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173351
Log:
PR debug/47994
PR debug/47919
* combine.c (try_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-04-05
23:37:52 UTC ---
Nevermind, I switched back to the old tree and found out the second testcase is
a different problem (or at least one that is not fixed by the patch for bug
47994)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-03-02 16:44:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 23516
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23516
different testcase
Another testcase that needs insane flags to reproduce...
$ gcc -fcse-follow-jumps
