--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 14:13
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43628 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 13:26 ---
This is caused by revision 154354:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00575.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 13:20 ---
*** Bug 45717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 12:32 ---
testcase from Bug 45334 reduced to a single file:
struct Base
{
virtual ~Base();
};
Base::~Base() {}
struct Derived : Base
{
virtual ~Derived();
void foo();
};
Derived::~Derived() {}
void Derived::foo()
--- Comment #6 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 12:26 ---
(adjusting title to be more general)
testcase from dup Bug 45181
struct S { int f(S*); };
int S::f(S* p)
{
return 0;
}
int main()
{
S s;
return s.f(&s);
}
within S::f p has type void*
Tom, CCing you a
