[Bug debug/43521] java: "this" pointer not marked with DW_AT_artificial

2010-05-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 17:06 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/43521] java: "this" pointer not marked with DW_AT_artificial

2010-05-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 17:00 --- Subject: Bug 43521 Author: jakub Date: Thu May 20 17:00:32 2010 New Revision: 159635 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159635 Log: PR debug/43521 * decl.c (start_java_method): Set

[Bug debug/43521] java: "this" pointer not marked with DW_AT_artificial

2010-05-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 15:42 --- Created an attachment (id=20702) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20702&action=view) gcc46-pr43521.patch Untested fix that seems to work on this testcase. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug debug/43521] java: "this" pointer not marked with DW_AT_artificial

2010-03-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywo

[Bug debug/43521] java: "this" pointer not marked with DW_AT_artificial

2010-03-25 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 18:47 --- Interesting note: if this case had an abstract origin instead of a specification, then 15e and 173 would both have DW_AT_abstract_origin, and the DW_AT_artificial would be inherited. As it is, though, the debug info is