--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-24 04:04 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00016.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32444
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 09:03 ---
Actually SRA should be ok, because we do keep tracking them on the tree level.
Daniel Berlin added this code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32444
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 09:01 ---
First temp is SRA'd so the debugging info should be correct unless tracking is
wrong. Second iv-opts is messing up the debuging info for i by creating a new
variable.
I think this is a feature we would like to supp
--- Comment #3 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 01:24 ---
I split out the problem with 'i' to PR 32445.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32444
--- Comment #2 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 01:13 ---
The problem with 'i' is ivopts.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32444
--- Comment #1 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 01:08 ---
Happens even with -O1. One of the causes is SRA, but there's more...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32444
