http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31412
--- Comment #22 from Kenneth Zadeck ---
if i had to put money on it, i would say that it is not dead, it is only
sleeping.
kenny
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31412
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31412
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Seems to be gone on trunk (4.9)
variable tracking : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall
48 kB ( 0%) ggc
var-tracking dataflow : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) w
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 15:12
---
variable tracking : 6.52 (17%) usr 0.10 ( 7%) sys 6.62 (17%) wall
41452 kB (25%) ggc
so this is still in the same order of magnitude than with the earlier reports.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 15:03
---
I'll leave this PR open because the testcase shows the bad compile-time
performance of the var-tracking df solver in general. The original bug,
infinite compile-time is probably fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gn
