--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 00:23 ---
No testcase in 3 months so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from alex dot jacob at logicacmg dot com 2006-07-31 09:27
---
Hi,
I'm just using -gno optimisations.
Cheers,
Alex
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28518
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-29 05:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Any ideas on the 'warning: Lowest section in /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 is
> .dynamic' messages ?
That is a gdb question and I don't know how to answer it.
Also are you compiling with just -
--- Comment #3 from alex dot jacob at logicacmg dot com 2006-07-28 19:00
---
Hello,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Sadly, I am not able to generate a test case for this. All the while loops I
write to try and duplicate this seems to work fine. The specific case where
this is a problem is
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 21:32 ---
Also we need a testcase to be able to reproduce this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 21:32 ---
And why do you think this is a GCC bug and not a GDB bug?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
