https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26475
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26475
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
--- Comment #5 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2009-07-30 18:40 ---
I just checked in the code to track locations through PHI arguments.
Comments and patch is located:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg01729.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26475
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-25 09:50 ---
I don't like unsharing constants. Instead we could force all constants to
be assigned to SSA names so they have their own statement. For PHI nodes
I believe Andrew has added location slots for each arg as part of t
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 23:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Dan Berlin, Diego, and I bounced this around on IRC a little. A couple of
> things that came up:
>
> - Diego suggested putting locuses on unshared INTEGER_CSTs as another
> possible approa
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-10 14:50 ---
I think this is confirmed.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-27 20:44 ---
Dan Berlin, Diego, and I bounced this around on IRC a little. A couple of
things that came up:
- Diego suggested putting locuses on unshared INTEGER_CSTs as another
possible approach.
- I suggested that if we wan
