[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-22 23:43 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables Devang Patel wrote: > > $ gdb --batch -x gdbcmds t > Reading symbols for shared libraries ... done > Breakpoint 1 at 0x2d14: file

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread dpatel at apple dot com
--- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-07-22 23:29 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:33 PM, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 21828 depends on bug 18556, which changed state. Bug 18556 Summary: [4.0 Regression] C++ debug is broken http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18556 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-22 21:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:53 > --- > I am closing i

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:53 --- I am closing it now. Since bug 21828 and bug 18556 are closely related, how can we make sure that fixing one won't break the other? Should I open a new meta bug? -- What|Removed |Ad

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-22 20:49 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:44 > --- > Mark, your pat

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
-- Bug 21828 depends on bug 18556, which changed state. Bug 18556 Summary: [4.0 Regression] C++ debug is broken http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18556 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:44 --- Mark, your patch caused bug 18556 to fail on Linux/ia64 again. -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 19:34 --- Fixed in 4.0.2. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESO

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22 19:33 --- Subject: Bug 21828 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-22 19:33:16 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug debug/21828] [4.0 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables

2005-07-22 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW