[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

2024-05-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Hi, can you clarify what you mean? Why does -gsplit-dwarf without -gdwarf-5 > emit in debug fission with extended dwarf-4 if it's specifically dealing > with dwarf 5? The sentence is indeed a bit ambiguou

[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

2024-05-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

2024-05-27 Thread llvm at rifkin dot dev via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy R. --- Hi, can you clarify what you mean? Why does -gsplit-dwarf without -gdwarf-5 emit in debug fission with extended dwarf-4 if it's specifically dealing with dwarf 5?

[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

2024-05-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/115235] Non-standard .debug_addr section

2024-05-26 Thread llvm at rifkin dot dev via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115235 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy R. --- Ope, my bad, it appears the section is generated properly with -gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-5.