https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aac3b6a7e3a7b810005343e62e6822338fcb85d4
commit r11-9052-gaac3b6a7e3a7b810005343e62e6822338fcb85d4
Author: John David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1710910087fb1f4a7706e9ce838163ffcbc50b4
commit r12-4058-gf1710910087fb1f4a7706e9ce838163ffcbc50b4
Author: John David Anglin
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-09-17 2:46 a.m., rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Btw, it works with a cross from x86_64 to hppa64-hp-hpux11, but maybe I'm
> doing
> it wrong?
It's probably caused by a bug in the T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, it works with a cross from x86_64 to hppa64-hp-hpux11, but maybe I'm doing
it wrong?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #2)
> On 2021-09-16 1:38 p.m., jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > This looks wrong, comp_unit_die () should have DW_AT_producer at this point.
> > gen_compile_unit_die
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-09-16 1:38 p.m., jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> This looks wrong, comp_unit_die () should have DW_AT_producer at this point.
> gen_compile_unit_die should have added it...
I did chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
