https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108408
ASSI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Stromeko at nexgo dot de
--- Comment #6 from ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108408
--- Comment #4 from Corinna ---
I'm not sure what you mean with "hybrid".
Cygwin is just one of the citizens in the newlib libc world, supporting
16, 32, and 64 bit targets. Usually the most full-featured one, but
still...
The underlying str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108408
--- Comment #5 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Corinna from comment #4)
> I'm not sure what you mean with "hybrid".
Probably the wrong word to use, based on what I was told via gcc irc.
"""
the relationship of cygwin1.dll and new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108408
--- Comment #3 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So a big part of what's missing in druntime bindings is *any* declarations for
version(CRuntime_Newlib) targets. Though as I understand it, Cygwin is a bit
of a hybrid in that matter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108408
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108408
Corinna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vinschen at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
