https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Oppenlander ---
Thanks. Sorry for the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
That seems already fixed in gcc-9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89113
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question becomes what is the scope for the compound literal?
