https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 25 16:43:59 2018
New Revision: 262027
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262027&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Sep 30 08:26:32 2017
New Revision: 253319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-09-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 29 07:35:37 2017
New Revision: 253280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/82340
* c-decl.c (build_compound_literal): Use c_appl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
--- Comment #2 from Pascal Cuoq ---
Richard:
> I don't see how a volatile compound literal could make any sense or how
> you'd observe the side-effect of multiple stores to it
Well, I have the same question about volatile variables the addres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener -
