https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Oct 2 23:57:19 2017
New Revision: 253372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Clean up more fallout from r252976.
libatomic/ChangeLog:
2017-10-02 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks Martin!, I'll follow the other ticket.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, the recent changes to the C++ tests are wrong. The failures are being
tracked under bug 82301. I have a patch out for review to fix both the tests
and the implementation of the warning to resolve the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Sep 25 14:59:19 2017
New Revision: 253153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81854
* src/c++98/complex_io.cc (_GLIBCXX_LD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Sep 22 16:30:35 2017
New Revision: 253100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix testsuite fallout from r252976.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
gcc.target/i386/pr80732.c fails with:
pr80732.c:46:8: warning: ‘f2’ ‘ifunc’ resolver should return a function pointer
[-Wattributes]
double f2(double a, double b, double c) __attribute__((ifunc("f2_resolve")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Sep 20 22:46:49 2017
New Revision: 253041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix C++ testsuite fallout from r252976.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Sep 20 22:19:53 2017
New Revision: 253037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix testsuite fallout from r252976.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
Thanks for the heads up! There's an additional problem in target-supports.exp
that needs fixing for the ifunc support to be correctly detected, and a few
mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The test gcc.dg/pr81854.c fails on darwin
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81854.c:30:1: error: ifunc is not
supported in this configuration
f3 (void); /* { dg-error ".ifunc. resolver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Sep 19 14:27:32 2017
New Revision: 252976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81854 - weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:12:03 2017
New Revision: 252495
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252495&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
PR c/81854
* src/c++98/compatibilit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Aug 20 21:31:39 2017
New Revision: 251211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
PR c/81854
* src/c++98/compatibility
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from Marti
17 matches
Mail list logo