https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79979
jdowdells at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79979
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Please read e.g. http://blog.regehr.org/archives/213 or other articles about UB
and just fix your code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79979
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79979
--- Comment #2 from jdowdells at hotmail dot com ---
Thanks for your quick reply.
However, this is not intuitive, the compiler should be "free to do anything" in
a sensible intuitive manner.
The for loop is well defined and there is no conceivab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79979
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
