https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 31 17:10:30 2016
New Revision: 241711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77886
* pt.c (tsubst_expr) Copy over
FALL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 31 13:39:49 2016
New Revision: 241700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77886
* pt.c (tsubst_expr) Copy over
FALL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #10 from Marc Mutz ---
I can confirm patch fixes my Qt build, ie. not just bug.cpp.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #8 from Marc Mutz ---
#c3 is also in a template, indeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #7 from Marc Mutz ---
Version:
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/d/gcc/trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #6 from Marc Mutz ---
Created attachment 39770
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39770&action=edit
Test case
Result:
$ g++ -Wextra -std=c++1z -O2 bug.cpp
bug.cpp: In function ‘void qt_memfill(T*, T, int) [with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #5 from Marc Mutz ---
It's in a function template, in case that helps. I'll try to trim it down now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #3 from Marc Mutz ---
Here's another example of a switch where I can't silence the warning, except by
C++11 attribute:
switch (i & 7) {
case 7: blender.write(line, reinterpret_cast(reinterpret_cast(srcPixels) + (v >> 16) * sbpl)[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
--- Comment #2 from Marc Mutz ---
It's worse than I thought:
int n = (count + 7) / 8;
switch (count & 0x07)
{
case 0: do { *dest++ = value;
// fall through
case 7: *dest++ = value;
// fall through
cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77886
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
13 matches
Mail list logo
