[Bug c/77453] No builtin version of cbrtf

2016-09-02 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77453 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/77453] No builtin version of cbrtf

2016-09-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77453 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andreas Sch

[Bug c/77453] No builtin version of cbrtf

2016-09-02 Thread matthieu.schaller at durham dot ac.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77453 Matthieu Schaller changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Matthieu S

[Bug c/77453] No builtin version of cbrtf

2016-09-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77453 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77453] No builtin version of cbrtf

2016-09-02 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77453 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Most built-in versions of libm functions just optimize them for constant arguments.