https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22)
> oops wait I thought this was a meta-bug for a moment... although, maybe it's
> time to start using it as one?
Never mind about this; looks like there's a keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski ---
Part of the C++ front-end issues was fixed with
r13-3046-gc823366fdb9069a54a37a3b18b65a4fa69feabfd . I didn't look to see if
all were fixed though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Comment #22 from Eric Gallager ---
oops wait I thought this was a meta-bug for a moment... although, maybe it's
time to start using it as one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vegard.nossum at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89003
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||donald.chai at synopsys dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 17913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Ed Smith-Rowland from comment #14)
> I wonder what the relationship of these expression statements are to lambdas.
>
> Is ({int _a = (a), _b = (b); _a > _b ? _a : _b; })
> equivalent to
> [](){in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nbkolchin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at veri
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-09
15:41 ---
Subject: Re: Statement expressions issues
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> No testcase? But I think this is fixed on the mainline and only pending on
> 4.0.
> See PR17913.
Th
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09
12:38 ---
No testcase? But I think this is fixed on the mainline and only pending on 4.0.
See PR17913.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
18:56 ---
*** Bug 20741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31
07:26 ---
Only a C++ front-end problem now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
19:59 ---
Subject: Bug 772
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:59:21
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLo
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-30
19:56 ---
Subject: Bug 772
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-30 19:56:40
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c c-tree.h c-typeck.c
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-27 13:24 ---
Some more discussion here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02310.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-27 13:21 ---
A similar problem are jumps via 'break'/'continue' out of statement
expressions. Here's a place where people have really used this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg00706.html
(Isn't the ability
19 matches
Mail list logo
