https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01423.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> Thanks, Manuel. That does the trick. Let me put a patch together.
Note also that the extra:
uu.c:3:26: note: (near initialization for ‘a’)
is just a rel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Robin ---
If I preprocessed the source with clang then compile it with GCC, I do have the
warning. This looks like it is related to the way NULL is expanded.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Robin ---
Created attachment 38489
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38489&action=edit
Preprocessed by Clang source file t.c attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Robin ---
Created attachment 38488
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38488&action=edit
Preprocessed by GCC source file t.c attached
