[Bug c/69429] gcc create sparse exec/libs

2016-01-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Of course even for ppc32. The ppc64 kernel supports ppc32 binaries.

[Bug c/69429] gcc create sparse exec/libs

2016-01-27 Thread joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 --- Comment #4 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Because most of the powerpc distros now use 64KB page size instead of 4KB, > so having only 4KB common page size means security protection

[Bug c/69429] gcc create sparse exec/libs

2016-01-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Because most of the powerpc distros now use 64KB page size instead of 4KB, so having only 4KB common page size means security protection of relro area usually does not work or covers smaller amount of data. Y

[Bug c/69429] gcc create sparse exec/libs

2016-01-22 Thread joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 --- Comment #2 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Why do you file this against gcc? If anything, it is related to binutils, You are right, I though it was a gcc problem because I downgrad

[Bug c/69429] gcc create sparse exec/libs

2016-01-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|