https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2016-2-2
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric at efcs dot ca
--- Comment #6 from M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
The GCC manual says the __atomic builtins are meant to be compatible with those
described in the Intel Itanium Processor-specific Application Binary Interface,
section 7.4. Both the ABI and the GCC manual des
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh one more thing about qualifiers: _Atomic is a qualifer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> Actually, with more testing I see the builtins do even more than that: they
> silently convert between pointers to types of the same size. (Clang
> diagnoses thos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So this might be following C++ rules here dealing with qualifiers.
There is no discarding of qualifiers either but rather adding them according to
C++ rules.
Note C and C++ deals with inner qualifiers diffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|atomic builtins silently|atomic builtins accept
