https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
Bogdan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Bogdan ---
Thank you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
jiaxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jia1546 at 163 dot com
--- Comment #5 from jiax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the referenced failure looks like it can be fixed by using -std=gnu89 as
part of the CFLAGS. That is it gcc 2.95 uses GNU 89 style inline which is
incompatible with C99 inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
--- Comment #2 from Bogdan ---
Any patches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69197
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|