https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
--- Comment #6 from Christos Zoulas ---
great, thank you. since this is tracked already you can close it if you want.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
There has been some discussion recently of adding -Wformat-pedantic (see
bug 67479), which would seem reasonable to me. A syslog format also seems
reasonable (but we already have bug 15338
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
--- Comment #4 from Christos Zoulas ---
I believe that -pedantic enables other "pedantic" warnings which I don't belive
I want. I can add a specific printf format that does not accept %m, but I would
still need to add a syslog format that does (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The gnu_printf format attribute is specifically supposed to accept %m; you
can use -pedantic to disallow it. Targets can override what the printf
attribute maps to; see config/i386/msforma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
--- Comment #2 from Christos Zoulas ---
something is wrong with the bug tracking system, when posting a bug with an
attachment as the first post; this is how the dup got created.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 67957 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
