https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It's basically a matter of whether you consider adding a new symbol
version to be appropriate in a backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
Chris Quenelle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chris.quenelle at oracle dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Nov 18 22:13:44 2015
New Revision: 230578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add out-of-line versions of some functions (PR c/65083).
PR c/65083 no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Presumably libatomic should get trivial wrappers for the macros, and
stdatomic.h should add corresponding function declarations.
