https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
--- Comment #3 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > "(a = 0) != 0" has a side effect of setting a to 0.
> >
> > I think in this case, clang is incorrectly warning ab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
"(a = 0) != 0" has a side effect of setting a to 0.
I think in this case, clang is incorrectly warning about it.
