https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so SCCVN only can forward constant addresses (because variable ones
wouldn't fit in the same refs vector without "inserting" ops). See
vn_reference_maybe_forwprop_address. It's also required so that w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #12 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
Created attachment 33963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33963&action=edit
test case where pragma simd disable vectorization
The following test case compiled with "-Ofast" vectoriz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.9.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.1 |4.9.2
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.9.1
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The wrong-code issue is now fixed, but we still don't vectorize this.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00514.html
for details. Note that without making the two pointer parameters linear on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Feb 8 09:10:14 2014
New Revision: 207629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/59984
* gimplify.c (gimplify_bind_expr): In ORT_SIMD region
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 32077
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32077&action=edit
Untested fix
Untested fix. Likely I'll need to do something more, so that we don't emit
extra decls for the debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess during gimplification when gimplifying #pragma omp simd body we should
add all the local variables (declared in the body) that aren't static and are
address taken to private clause on the #pragma omp s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin ---
vect details show that v1.0_14 = v1 and v2.1_15 = v2 are treated as invariants:
test.c:24:14: note: -->vectorizing statement: v1.0_14 = v1;
test.c:24:14: note: transform statement.
test.c:24:14: note: tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Vectorizer dump snippet for main:
foo.simdclone.0 (vect__12.7_3, vect_cst_.8_53, vect_cst_.8_53,
vect_cst_.9_51, vect_cst_.9_51);
GIMPLE_NOP
vect_v1.12_37 = MEM[(int *)vectp_v1.10_39]; (1)
v1.0_14 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
Created attachment 31981
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31981&action=edit
test case
20 matches
Mail list logo