http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Olaf from comment #3)
> Well... naive me found it quite surprising and unexpected that the following
> two lines produce grossly different results:
>
> double result1 = -s1*d1 + s2*d2;
> double r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961
--- Comment #3 from Olaf ---
Well... naive me found it quite surprising and unexpected that the following
two lines produce grossly different results:
double result1 = -s1*d1 + s2*d2;
double result2 = s2*d2 - s1*d1;
...but never mind.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59961
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
-100 is not the same as -s1. The latter is SIZE_MAX + 1 - 100, a big number,
depending on the size of size_t. If s1 is declared as unsigned short or
unsigned char, it will be promoted to int before any futh
