http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58531
--- Comment #4 from Guillaume ---
Ok i understand.
I took a sad brain shortcut assuming a single block declaration was generating
an (only possible) increasing address for each compound.
This was working on all previous gcc version i used (as far
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58531
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58531
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume ---
Created attachment 30897
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30897&action=edit
test.c / Makefile
