[Bug c/56980] Misleading note

2013-04-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56980 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guest at mailinator dot com --- Co

[Bug c/56980] Misleading note

2013-04-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56980 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-16 15:34:56 UTC --- while the C++ pretty-printer can: pr56980.c:4:16: error: invalid operands of types ‘B* {aka A*}’ and ‘B* {aka A*}’ to binary ‘operator>>’ int y = x >> x; ^

[Bug c/56980] Misleading note

2013-04-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56980 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #3 from Man

[Bug c/56980] Misleading note

2013-04-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56980 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/56980] Misleading note

2013-04-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56980 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-16 15:24:46 UTC --- Confirmed, but I seriously doubt it has anything to do with my patch. At the moment of warning we get: (gdb) p debug_tree(type) unit size align 32 symtab 0 a