http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #9 from Richard B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to swalter from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> > The header file malloc.h (which is non-standard by the way) has the
> > attribute malloc on the malloc function call.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #7 from swalter at lexmark dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> The header file malloc.h (which is non-standard by the way) has the
> attribute malloc on the malloc function call.
>
> So this is invalid.
Sorry, c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #5 from swalter at lexmark dot com 2012-10-18 13:41:13 UTC ---
Thanks for looking into this, Richard. I should have mentioned that you'll
need to build with optimization turned on.
Expected behavior:
test.c built with -O -fno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
Brendan Chandler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bren at ragh dot us
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #2 from swalter at lexmark dot com 2012-10-17 16:14:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28463
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28463
malloc implementation for test.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #1 from swalter at lexmark dot com 2012-10-17 16:10:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 28462
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28462
Bug testcase
