http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #13 from Pierre Ossman ---
This was tested using gcc 4.7.2 and gcc 4.5.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #12 from Pierre Ossman ---
Created attachment 30420
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30420&action=edit
Makefile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #11 from Pierre Ossman ---
Created attachment 30419
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30419&action=edit
main.c
We've also been hitting this, so here is a reduced test case to provoke the
bug. Output in the failing ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-16 06:36:27
UTC ---
Youo can start from [1], you have a failing output there, just provide some
reference input to failing function.
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47559#c8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-16 06:33:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > I've tried to take the source-file in question (miarc.c) and make something
> > self-contained, but I was unable to make it work due to this being an
> > i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-16 06:30:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I've tried to take the source-file in question (miarc.c) and make something
> self-contained, but I was unable to make it work due to this being an internal
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #7 from Da Fox 2012-05-01
07:54:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
...
> The latest available gcc-version for my distribution (gentoo) appears to be
> 4.6.2, which I will try next.
This seems to still happen with 4.6.2 at least.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
Da Fox changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
--- Comment #6 from Da Fox 2012-04-25
07:30:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-23 15:29:03
UTC ---
BTW: Can you test if this problem is still present in a newer version of the
compiler (i.e. 4.6.3 or 4.7.0)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-23 14:50:54
UTC ---
Unfortunately, this is a runtime failure, so we will also need a runtime
testcase (probably minimized) that fails when compiled with options that expose
the bug.
In comment #8 of the li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #3 from Da Fox 2012-04-23
12:28:06 UTC ---
gcc -v output:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.0/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #2 from Da Fox 2012-04-23
12:26:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 27220
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27220
.i version of miarc.c
I think this is the information that was missing:
The file in question compiled with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53083
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-23 07:55:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I additional information is required please let me know.
Please provide all necessary information, as outlined in [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report
14 matches
Mail list logo