https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #5 from Timo Kreuzer 2013-01-11
14:55:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Like __atomic_compare_exchange_n?
Oh, didn't know of this one, thanks.
But I'm sure there are other similar things you could solve with the output o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2013-01-10 14:12:54
UTC ---
Like __atomic_compare_exchange_n?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
Timo Kreuzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timo.kreuzer at reactos dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-02-27
21:08:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think asm goto was designed to contain more than a computed jump
> instruction. And I don't know how reliably we could allocate registers
> for output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
