http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-03
15:53:13 UTC ---
noone's insulted and noone's flaming, but in future please follow the bug
reporting guidelines (and maybe check with someone who knows C well before
assuming the compiler is wrong, e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #5 from stfu&thnk 2012-01-03 15:47:08 UTC ---
yeah i just realised how the second one was a fail of my side.
but I didn't realze the rvalue lvalue stuff.
thanx for the help, and please don't go all pissed off I didn't want to insult
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-03
15:25:32 UTC ---
The bug reporting guidelines at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ ask for the following
which you have not provided:
* the exact version of gcc
* the exact command line
* the complete prepro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #3 from stfu&thnk 2012-01-03 15:23:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> as soon as you cast the .where pointer to some other type it converts to
> an rvalue. Use (knot*)&(where) instead of &(knot *)(...where).
I don't know how t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
--- Comment #2 from stfu&thnk 2012-01-03 15:21:26 UTC ---
I fail &secon one. forgot a * -.-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51741
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
